Saturday, September 23, 2006

Hello blog, part deux

I really should be asleep now, but I've neglected you, so here's a little update. I'm questioning the reason for your existence. Well, apart from the fact that I have to update you because it's a course requirement. :p

That's like saying, "Hello boyfriend, I've neglected you for so long I thought I'd call. By the way I'm questioning the reason we're together in the first place."

I have a knack for making people feel good. I also have 3 thousand things due on Monday. This is sooooo not the time for an existential debate.

Help me!

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Bloggers vs. Journalists

A question was posed to us: Is it a good thing that blogs are blossoming in Malaysia?

A little background. I read both newspapers and blogs, and I have to admit I have a great deal more respect for people like Jeff Ooi, Mack Zul and of course my lecturer Oon Yeoh (blatant ass kissing :p) than publications like the Star or NST.

I think the debate between bloggers vs. journalists does not have to be dragged out to this extent, and I think it is a waste of time to be fighting one another when you can work together to achieve something greater than what each camp is able to do individually.

Perhaps this is the idealism and naiveté kicking in again, but I believe that if someone wants to pervert the flow of information and mislead the public, they can do so regardless of whether they’re a blogger, a journalist, or an editor.

The Star ran a feature in Section 2 regarding the possibility of changing homosexuals back to heterosexuals, quoting solely from a study conducted by a Dr. Robert Spitzer which was criticised for the methodology used, ie sample bias.

Gay and lesbians subjects who took part in the subject were not your everyday gay and lesbian people. They were mostly from ex-gay ministries and organisations involved in reparation, which raises questions about the objectivity and agenda behind the publication of Spitzer’s findings.

I know this because I’ve been involved in intense gay rights debates in a Blizzforums, and have done research into the arguments and studies quoted by the anti-gay camp. How many Star readers know about this? How many would bother to look this up after reading the feature?

In this case I would argue that precisely because of the fact that journalists are more respected and are perceived to have more credibility that they are able to easily manipulate the public into thinking that what is printed in a newspaper is the gospel truth.

Who knows how many people the Star has managed to ‘convince’ that being gay is a choice when there is no definitive neutral study to prove it one way or another?

Then there is the infamous feud between blogger Jeff Ooi and the editor of NST, both of whom saw fit to use their arsenal of weapons against each other in a fight that was nothing but a personal vendetta. For the editor of a national newspaper to subject readers to the crap that was printed, for no other purpose than to settle petty personal disputes, is just ridiculous to say the least.

So again I ask, what credibility? Perhaps those are isolated incidents, but I can help but ask, if they can do this once with no repercussions whatsoever, who’s to say they won’t do it again? That statement applies to both the Star and the NST, and while these episodes really opened my eyes, the silver lining is that after those incidents I am extremely skeptical of the things that I read in our dailies.

That’s about enough exposition, now to answer the question. I think it’s a good thing that there’re blogs around who alert us to the things that are really happening. From the Memogate incident that led to CBS anchor Dan Rather’s resignation, to the discussions and opinions regarding the inter-faith forum in the blogosphere, blogs provide an avenue for information and debate.

Sure, what’s said in blogs does not carry the weight of what’s said in publications, and people may be misled by what’s said in some blogs. However, I think that people need to learn not to trust everything they read, and to refer to more than one source before making up their minds. If they need to learn it the hard way, then at the very least, at the end of the day, they will have learned.

Oon Yeoh mentioned that there are young people who only read blogs for news, and that is a bad thing. On the other side of the spectrum there are people who only read newspapers for news, and at the end of the day the issue is relying on one news source and one perspective, regardless of whether it’s newspapers, blogs, online publications etc.

Someone in Blizzforums once said to me, the mark of a good debater is one who can argue both sides of the issue. You can’t do that if you only confine yourself to one viewpoint.

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

A day in the life of a cyber sleuth

Ok, so I didn't do this all in one day :p

Things I already knew about Oon Yeoh
  1. Blogger (Transitions).
  2. IT columnist.
  3. Editor of The Sun online edition.
  4. Lecturer.
  5. Started out as a the Malaysian correspondent for Nikkei.
  6. Master of all cyber sleuths.
  7. Involved in a huge flame-fest a few years back over the issue of the Iraq war and was the only one standing in the American corner.

Things I didn't know
  1. From Nizam Zakaria
    Born in Kota Bharu, Kelantan but grew up in Penang, USA and Singapore.
    Secondary school was Raffles Institution (Singapore), and college was University of Texas (Austin, USA).
    Represented Malaysia in Judo in the mid-1990s.
    Moved back to Malaysia in 1996 and started career in journalism.
    Fan of Mac

  2. from Bodhivision
    Writer/director for a documentary called "Chief: the life and work of K Sri Dhammananda".

  3. From JGNews
    Participated in a book launch and cyberactivists roundtable talks.

  4. From Angryman
    Provided inspiration for a blog.

  5. From Eye on Everything
    Provided more inspiration.
  6. From Bibliobibuli
    Had a knee operation, and needeed crutches to walk around after suffering from an infection.

  7. from CNET's Lemak Lemang
    Blogger for CNET Asia's sister online media, ZDNet Asia.
    Promotes podcasting.

  8. From Education Malaysia
    Working on a political biography of Lim Kit Siang.

  9. From The Buddhist Channel
    Member of the "International Advisory Panel for The Buddhist Channel.
    Working on a book featuring the thoughts of Rev K.Sri Dhammananda.
    Senior Editorial Consultant to the Buddhist Channel.

  10. From Sunday People
    Host of Innovation with Oon Yeoh for Asiastream.tv

  11. From John Ling
    Moderator of MPH Writer's Circle.

  12. From the Book Review Blog
    Author of Transition - Making Sense of the Digital Age.

  13. From Global Voices Online
    Featured in the Global Voices Show #2.

  14. From Flickr
    Has a flickr account

  15. From Nizam Zakaria
    Editorial consultant for the KLue magazine for six months.

  16. From Mobile World
    Photo credit in profile features.

  17. From Peter Tan
    Interviewed Peter Tan for the Sun online edition

  18. From E-homemakers
    Contributed article on IT tips & issues to E-homemakers.

Writing Assignment 1: joining the rat race

I’ve never actually worked for money before, only for free beer, so I was looking forward to my internship with trepidation and wee bit of excitement. People have told me in the past that working life is hectic, and I won’t be able handle it, so I was curious as to how it would play out.

On the first day of my internship, I was supposed to reach the office at 8am and report to the editor, but I ended up waiting until 11am. Thankfully there were some fellow interns so at least I wasn’t sitting alone like some sad doofus.

Working in a women’s mag was easier than I thought it would be; it was certainly less stressful than studying. However, it also shattered some illusions I had about the industry.

I haven’t had any experience working in a newspaper before, but the magazine I was with has a pretty incestuous relationship with the other magazines under the same umbrella company. By incestuous I don’t mean office sex, but the way the conduct business.

As we all know, women’s magazines have staff recommendations of products. At my mag, they don’t actually canvas for opinions from customers or readers, but insteasd pass the products to fellow colleagues for testing. When they need models to go for makeovers, they recruit either relatives, friends or, you guessed it, fellow colleagues again!

While this certainly makes the job easier, I feel that the magazine exist in its own little world with very little interaction with the real world, as the opinions are of those working for women’s magazines only. Objectivity is also compromised as their own people are getting the benefits.

There’s no actual survey of feelings and opinion on the grassroots level in Malaysia, which is different from the way the Singapore version is done. The Singaporean edition looks for customers of the product or the product’s competitors for opinions and recommendations, while makeover models are actual members of the public who submit a photo with reasons why they should be selected for the makeover.

At least there’s at least some semblance at transparency and objectivity, compared to the Malaysian edition, where the beauty claims made are often dubious at best. It certainly made me question whether the mag placed an equal importance on selling more copies and credibility, though perhaps in the world of women’s magazine those 2 terms are mutually exclusive.

The writers employed at the mag also a tad disappointing, as over the two-month course I’ve heard senior writers being berated by the sub-editor for lifting material from wikipedia and other websites without checking the veracity of the text.

There were also writers who were unable to tell the difference between an active and passive sentence, and did not know when the usage for each was appropriate. She was also unable to differentiate between an apostrophe and a quotation mark - she used quotation marks for an entire article when she should've used an apostrophe.

Now lest I be accused of only seeing the glass as half empty, here're the good bits.

It was eye-opening to work for a women’s magazine as we get to go and loan stuff from shops that I normally won’t enter.

On one trip with my editor, I was holding more than 50k worth of goods in my bony little arms. That was a surreal and overwhelming experience, and also very scary. I kept hoping I wasn’t going to trip or drop any of the stuff and end up paying damages, as I don’t have enough kidneys to sell to raise 50k.

It was also a learning experience to find out what goes on behind a photoshoot, and the work needed to organize one, from loaning products to arranging for models, and slotting time for the studio.

Personally, the most memorable experience was to go for a professional hair makeover and then posing as a model for the mag’s makeover section. I’m a geeky gamer, so getting made up and looking pretty was a change from the norm. I was uncomfortable at the photoshoot though, and can finally say for sure that modelling may be for some people, but it’s definitely not for me.

This job wasn’t exactly a challenge in terms of writing, but it was a good learning experience, and it has encouraged me try working in other kinds of publications to get a feel of how things might be like.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

In an ideal world…

…journalists would be responsible to exposing the truth and speaking up for the weak and undertrod. As a journalist I believe you have been entrusted with a voice that can reach many people, so use it to inform and spread awareness, regardless of how ugly the truth may seem to be.

…journalists would be honest, both with themselves and with their readers. I think if during the course of your research you find something that contradicts your beliefs, you should verify it and mention it in your article. I think it’s despicable to intentionally pass off information you know is biased as truth (the Star’s article on reversing homosexuality anyone?), and it should not be done at all.

…journalists should be critical while trying to maintain their objectivity and independence. It is pointless for journalists to merely parrot stories without analysing deeper into the consequences and effects of, say, Israel’s recent military forays into Lebanon and Palestine.

…journalists would be curious and observant about the things that happen around them. Sometimes it’s not so much about the things you see, but the things you don’t that require exposure.

…journalists would be persistent and stubborn in their quest to inform, staying on course, taking risks and having the courage and tenacity to talk about difficult subjects in a way that appeal to the public.

Constraints and Sacrifices
I think journalists are constrained in terms of relationships, as there are certain people they have to keep their distance from if they wish to maintain the perception of objectivity and independence. If one day my best friend decides to be a furniture tycoon, I’ll either have to maintain my distance from her, at least in public, or not cover issues regarding labour and the environment.

Some friends and family may not necessarily get the need for constant questioning and may view it as a nuisance or creating drama. Personally I have come across instances where my friends have said that it would be easier if I can just shut up and go with it instead of questioning certain things that people do.

I think as a journalist I would have to get used to being branded as a trouble-maker and a complainer, even from friends, as I feel it is very important to bring up issues or policies that I feel are unfair or discriminatory towards a particular group of people, and I will have to accept that some time people may not see it that way.

Journalists are also not supposed to be activists, as they should be there to document history and not to make it. This is an area I suspect I may have a problem with as I like to be doing things instead of just talking about it. We spoke about blogger Mr Brown’s column suspension in class, and technically as journalists we’re not supposed to participate, only to chronicle. However, if I was in Singapore during that period of time, it would have been quite difficult for me to stay away from it.

At the end of the day
I will try anything once, so I think it's worth it to at least give it a shot before calling it quits. This is a very idealised version of what Journalism in Malaysia is, and I'm prepared for all the rude shocks I'm going to receive when I start working for real. It's also highly likely that I won't like what I'll be doing in about a year's time, but hey, you never know unless you try.

Monday, July 17, 2006

A hunting we will go

Journalism
From Dictionary.com
The collecting, writing, editing, and presenting of news or news articles in newspapers and magazines and in radio and television broadcasts.

The style of writing characteristic of material in newspapers and magazines, consisting of direct presentation of facts or occurrences with little attempt at analysis or interpretation.


I think this definition is mostly towards news reporting as it is very traditional and narrow. Merely presenting the news is not sufficient now as audiences today would like to know the consequences or effects of an event. For example, the escalating violence in the Middle East will have far-reaching religious and political consequences for people around the world, and some sort of analysis would be expected in a credible newspaper.

Journalism to me also entails using facts that are verifiable, as that ensures integrity and credibility of the news writer and the publication as well. When reporting something, a journalist should always check and re-check his or her facts, especially when writing critical articles, as it would only make the writer look stupid for basing an entire article off assumptions.

Finally, journalism also evokes independence, to be able to touch on and argue any issue rationally, and to be able to provoke people into thinking and asking questions.

Alternative Media
From AlterNet.
Debates about the differences between mainstream and alternative media often see mainstream media as "maximizing audiences by appealing to safe, conventional formulas" and alternative media as "foregoing the comfortable, depoliticizing formulas to advocate programs of social change"

I agree with this definition as I think the mainstream media is owned by corporations whose first duty, first and foremost, is to the Board of Directors. In Malaysia examples abound, as all major TV stations, publications and radio channels are owned by corporations owned directly by the ruling party or controlled by their proxies. The only form of alternative media would be Malaysiakini, the independently-run blogs, and a few publications that aren’t available to most of the population.

Mainstream media appeal to the status quo and do not rock the boat as the biggest money making tactic is to appeal to the lowest common denominator. New ideas or social change will not be big on the agenda as the main role is not to provoke thought, but to pacify audiences with entertainment and earn more money.

Advocacy Journalism
From Environment Writer Newsletter July/August 1999.
Advocacy is a word we have been taught to avoid. It marks a bias, something most journalists are convinced should not be acknowledged, despite the fact that it is inescapable.

I agree with the definition of advocacy journalism as it describes the subjectiveness of this form of writing, but I disagree that advocacy journalism is said to be unfair. Sometimes, in situations where the issue or cause represented by advocacy journalism is lost or forgotten by the mainstream media, then this form of journalism is needed to represent the people who still believe in the cause or opinion.

Advocacy journalism does not masquerade as balanced journalism, and even if there was am intention eventually people will recognise that it represents only a particular viewpoint.